Carl Republican

Carl Republican

Democrats on Saddam Hussein's WMD'S BEFORE the WAR.......

Mikulski, Al gore, Pelosi, Durbin, Nelson, Feingold.Top left to bottom right: Byrd, Albright, Rockefeller, Breaux, Dodd, Landrieu, Kennedy, Richardson, Edwards, Lautenberg, Gephardt, Kerry, Berger, Feinstein, Daschle, Inouye, Lieberman, Clinton, Harman, Biden, Bayh, Johnson, Kerrey, Levin, Schumer, Graham, Hillary

PICTURES WOULD NOT COPY -BUT YOU GET THE POINT!!!
THESE TWO FACES LIERS ALL SAID THE SAME THING BEFORE BUSH CAME INTO OFFICE IN 3/2001.
JUST LOOK AT HOW THEY ALL ACTED THEN AND LOOK AT THEM NOW. THEIR LAME EXCUSE OF "BUSH LIED" AND "BUSH COOKED THE INTELLIGENCE " IS AN INSULT TO ANY AMERICAN WHO HAS HALF A BRAIN.

DONT LET THESE SLIME BALLS GET AWAY WITH WHAT THEY SAID BEFORE BUSH WAS PRESIDENT.

BESIDES HOW DID CHINA, FRANCE, GERMANY, RUSSA, JAPAN, ETC ALL SAY SADDAM HAD WMD'S BECUASE SADDAM MISLEAD THE ENTIRE WORLD !!! Wake up Americans and DONT FALL THE DEMOCRATS WEAK EXCUSES AND LAME NATIONAL SECURITY IDEA'S IF WE DO WE WILL HAVE ANOTHER 9/11 ATTACK !!!



October 9th, 1999 Letter to President Clinton Signed by Senators Levin, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Dodd, Kerrey, Feinstein, Mikulski, Daschle, Breaux, Johnson, Inouye, Landrieu, Ford and Kerry -- all Democrats "We urge you, after consulting with Congress and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."



Joe Biden > August 4, 2002 "This is a guy who is an extreme danger to the world, and this is a guy who is in every way possible seeking weapons of mass destruction."

Chuck Schumer > October 10, 2002 "It is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states."

John Kerry > January 23, 2003 "Without question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he's miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction."

Sandy Berger > February 18, 1998
"He'll use those weapons of mass destruction again as he has 10 times since 1983."

Senator Carl Levin > September 19, 2002
"We begin with a common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations, is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."

Senator Hillary Clinton > October 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock. His missile delivery capability, his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists including Al-Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

Madeleine Albright > November 10, 1999
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."

Robert Byrd > October 3, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of '98. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons."

Al Gore > September 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

Joe Biden > August 4, 2002 "I think he has anthrax. I have not seen any evidence that he has smallpox, but you hear them say, Tim (Russert), is the last smallpox outbreak in the world was in Iraq; ergo, he may have a strain."

Bill Clinton > December 17, 1998 "Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq.... Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."

Hillary Clinton > October 10, 2002 "In the four years since the inspections, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability and his nuclear program."

Dick Gephardt > September 23, 2002 "(I have seen) a large body of intelligence information over a long time that he is working on and has weapons of mass destruction. Before 1991, he was close to a nuclear device. Now, you'll get a debate about whether it's one year away or five years away."

Russell Feingold > October 9, 2002"With regard to Iraq, I agree Iraq presents a genuine threat, especially in the form of weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological and potentially nuclear weapons. I agree that Saddam Hussein is exceptionally dangerous and brutal, if not uniquely so, as the president argues."

Johnny Edwards > January 7, 2003 "Serving on the intelligence committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. It's just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons."

John Kerry > January 31, 2003 "If you don't believe...Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn't vote for me."

Bill Nelson > September 14, 2002 "I believe he has chemical and biological weapons. I think he's trying to develop nuclear weapons, and the fact that he might use those is a considerable threat to us."

Al Gore > September 23, 2002 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

Tom Daschle >February 11, 1998 "The (Clinton) administration has said, 'Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?' That's what they're saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we don't have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily."

Bill Richardson > May 29, 1998 "The threat of nuclear proliferation is one of the big challenges that we have now, especially by states that have nuclear weapons, outlaw states like Iraq."

Hillary Clinton > October 10, 2002 "It is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

Al Gore > December 16, 1998 "[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He has already demonstrated a willingness to use such weapons..."



Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

Madeleine Albright > February 1, 1998
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."

Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Al Gore > September 23, 2002
"We know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

John Kerry > October 9, 2002
"I will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

Ted Kennedy > September 27, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

Jay Rockefeller > October 10, 2002
"There was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

Joe Biden > August 4, 2002
"[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something terrible. That is true. But there's been no connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesn't mean he won't. This is a bad guy."

Madeline Albright > February 18, 2002 Iraq is a long way from (here), but what happens there matters a great deal here, for the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest national security threat we face -- and it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm."

Jane Harman > August 27, 2002 "I certainly think (Hussein's) developing nuclear capability which, fortunately, the Israelis set back 20 years ago with their preemptive attack which, in hindsight, looks pretty darn good."

Dick Durbin > September 30, 1999 "One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons."

Bill Nelson > August 25, 2002 "[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam has chemical and biological weapons, and I expect that he is trying to develop a nuclear weapon. So at some point, we might have to act precipitously."

Nancy Pelosi > October 10, 2002 "Yes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons."

Evan Bayh > August 4, 2002 "I'm inclined to support going in there and dealing with Saddam, but I think that case needs to be made on a separate basis: his possession of biological and chemical weapons, his desire to get nuclear weapons, his proven track record of attacking his neighbors and others."

Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998 "We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Century.... They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."

Hillary Clinton > January 22, 2003 "I voted for the Iraqi resolution. I consider the prospect of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein who can threaten not only his neighbors but the stability of the region and the world, a very serious threat to the United States."

Joe Biden > August 4, 2002 "We know he continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability, including nuclear capability."

Johnny Edwards > February 6, 2003 "The question is whether we're going to allow this man who's been developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where -- if we're going to stop him if he invades a country around him -- it'll cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives."

Joe Biden > August 4, 2002 "First of all, we don't know exactly what he has. It's been five years since inspectors have been in there, number one. Number two, it is clear that he has residual of chemical weapons and biological weapons, number one."

Senator Bob Graham > December 8, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."

John Kerry > February 23, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the Middle East."



These quotes are all in the congressional records DO YOUR HOME WORK and dont fall for thesde left wing weak on national security liberals we are at WAR with International Isalmic Terrorists who want to kill you and your family!!! Vote REPUBLICAN !!!!!

FYI..you wont seen in the Main Stream Media!!!!!

The Democrats top 10 sex and sleze scandles you all forgot about !!!!


10. Sen. Daniel Inouye. The 82-year-old Hawaii Democrat was accused in the 1990s by numerous women of sexual harassment. Democrats cast doubt on the allegations and the Senate Ethics Committee dropped its investigation.

9. Former Rep. Gus Savage. The Illinois Democrat was accused of fondling a Peace Corps volunteer in 1989 while on a trip to Africa. The House Ethics Committee decided against disciplinary action in 1990.

8. Rep. Barney Frank. The outspoken Massachusetts Democrat hired a male prostitute who ran a prostitution service from Frank’s residence in the 1980s. Only two Democrats in the House of Representatives voted to censure him in 1990.

7. Former Sen Brock Adams the late Washington Democrat was forced to stop campaigning after numerous accusations of drugging, assault and rape, the first surfacing in 1988.

6. Former Rep. Fred Richmond. This New York Democrat was arrested in 1978 for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old. He remained in Congress and won re-election—before eventually resigning in 1982 after pleading guilty to tax evasion and drug possession.

5. Former Rep. John Young. The late Texas Democrat increased the salary of a staffer after she gave in to his sexual advances. The congressman won re-election in 1976 but lost two years later.

4. Former Rep. Wayne Hays. The late Ohio Democrat hired an unqualified secretary reportedly for sexual acts. Although he resigned from Congress, the Democratic House leadership stalled in removing him from the Administration Committee in 1976.

3. Former Rep. Gerry Studds. He was censured for sexual relationship with underage male page in 1983. Massachusetts voters returned him to office for six more terms.(now thats what I call a double standard with Republican congressman !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

2. Former Rep. Mel Reynolds. The Illinois Democrat was convicted of 12 counts of sexual assault with a 16-year-old. President Bill Clinton pardoned him before leaving office.( wow!!! what a president!!!with great morals !

1. Sen. Teddy Kennedy. The liberal Massachusetts senator testified in defense of nephew accused of rape, invoking his family history to win over the jury in 1991..............
this list left off Teddy's drunked car crash in the 1960's at Chappaquitic where he killed a innocent young women by leaving here to drown to death !! wow those Mass. liberals sure know how to pickem !!! if your a Democrat in Mass. you CAN MURDER SOME ONE AND BE ELECTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE !!! THATS AMERICA !

CAN THESE BUMS AND VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!! cathe Archives


(Read our Privacy Policy.)

Democrat's cannot be trusted to run this country

I did a search from the NY Times archives on : Saddam/Clinton from 1996 to 2001 and found over 200 headines on this subject. Most said Saddam was evil and all the way up to 2001 the NY Times still said he weapons of mass destruction.
I find it TRULY amazing that the Democrats can get away with their hypocrisy on this war when President Clinton and Secretary of State Albright as well as Kennedy, Kerry, Levin,VP Gore, Rockefeller, Dodd, Richardson,Edwards, Gephart, Liberman, Hilliary, Biden, Bayh, Johnson, Mikulski, Nancy please, Dick Durbin, Feingold ! ALL SAID SADDAM WAS EVIL AND MUST BE REMOVED!!!!!

John Murtha the HAWK dubbed by the main stream media said in an interview on the NBC Today's show in September 1993, after 4 rangers died in Somalia, " Our welcome has been worn out ". He went on to say " " he (Clinton) listened to our suggestions . And I think you'll see him move those troops out very quickly ". Taking Murtha's advice president Clinton pulled our troops out and the world perceived it as a defeat for America. This was to have a profound effect on the war on terror. In a 1998 interview which has been burried by the main stream media, but keep alive by Limbaugh and Newsmax.com I have a copy of what was said.

Osama bin Laden was interview live by ABC's John Miller, the last American to get an interview with the chief stategic and finnacial planner of the attacks on the World Trade Centers in2001. " Osama said "our people realize(d) more than before that American soldier is a paper tiger that run(s) in defeat after a few blows. America forgot all about the hoopla and media propaganda and left dragging their corpses and their shameful defeat " he said !!!

Osama goes on to say , " America's withdrawal form Somalia emboldens us to raise more attacks and encourages us for more attacks " . Just think 8 years later and MANY obvious signs (Embessey attackes in Africa, Kobar Towers, USS Cole, etc.) we were attacked and should have been PROACTIVE all during the 1990's with evil dictators and terrorists leaders !!!

This is what the Bush Adminsitration is tring to do !!! Take the fight to the enemy. I challege all Americans to go back in the archives of any newspaper and read the headlines from 1996 to 2001 and you will se the failures of the UN to stop Saddam and now we know why becuase they were involved in the OIL FOR FOOD SCANDEL with Saddam. Our supposed allies of France , Germany and Russia were taking BRIBES from Saddam and getting paid off in OIL !!! Know wonder they opposed us into going into Iraq!!! You will read Kofiannons lame EXCUSSES for protecting Saddam aginst Clinton and Bush leaders/policies-again being PAID off by Saddam. You will see the MASS headlines of "Saddam still a threat with WMD'S all the way untill 2003 !!! You will read how Saddam " removes all UN weapons inpectors" from 1996 to the start of the war. He was rebuilding his military all during the 1990's while breaking UN sanctions!

FACT-Saddam defied 14 UN resolutions and broke over 23 UN sanctions !!!! Finnaly, you will see NY Times headlines saying," China's intelligence belives Saddam to have Biological and chemical weapons".

I am still surching for a intelligent Democrate to logically/rationally explain how Germany, France, Russia, China, Great Britian, Japan, others all came to the same conclusion as the Clinton/Bush administration's that Saddam had wepons of mass destruction, but yet the Iraq war is all Bush's fault ! I cannot find any logic at all in this argument ! People wake up and do your homework and you will see that it is the Republicans that are better to lead this country and protect you.

Democrats are historicaly WEAK on defense (John Kerry's voting record), they are weak on boarder security and immagration. They oppose international spying, by calling it "domestic spying" even though President Clinton did it. They are for BURNING THE AMERICAN FLAG as freedom of speech. They oppose the" pledge of allegence "in the schools beacause the word "GOD" is used. They are infavor of gay marrage. They oppose almost any religious references in any public place. Democrats are blocking legisation ( Harry Reid/Ted Kennedy) to pass Jessica"s law -to put child preditors behind bars for longer and harsher terms !

Now which party represents the strong moral standards our county was founded on. VOTE REPUBLICAN IN NOVEMBER !!!!!!